Play as Life

Digital games as a form of play. Play as a part of life.

January 19, 2010 • 8:00 am 2

The Evolution of Sex in Video Games: Walking Erect

Post includes mature content -Ed.

The title for this article is without a doubt this is the most salacious title I have ever written.  In some ways it conveys an intended jolt. Sexuality often is a speed bump in a narrative. While there have been some examples of mature handling of sexual content  the majority of  treatments we see in the past focus on titillation and are targeted towards a young male audience.  Fortunately I think the medium is starting to evolve away from the early examples.   In the last three years we are starting to see sexuality enter into the narrative as less of a shock and more of an enhancement to the story and plot.

Let us start with some brief history.  My intent is not to thoroughly cover the subject but to talk about where we have been and where we are going.  Note: I am mainly covering games that are released in North America. Discussing Asian games would be a  different conversation with its own positives and negatives.

Custer’s Revenge

Quality cover design must mean cobbling together art from several different sources.

Ah, Mystique.  Rarely has a company name been so ironic.  There is very little mystique involved with what they were trying to accomplish and who they would attract.  Custer’s Revenge wasn’t the only pornographic game for the Atari 2600, but it is one of the most notable for its garishness and offensiveness.  Complete details here.

Rape should never be a gameplay mechanic.  There is very little to see here and discuss, the game wears its intention on its sleeve.

Dragon’s Lair

I'm sure she dresses like this all the time.

No direct sex or nudity here and I consider the Don Bluth  animation in the game to be a masterwork, but let’s discuss the goal of the game.  Everything comes down to saving Princess Daphne.  Her squeaky Alberto Vargas inspired design was pretty much meant to convey one thing.  If you rescued her there would be ‘sexy time’.  See this video of the ending.  Less overt than the above, but probably not going to win any awards for realism.

Captain Blood

Video examples above contain no sex or nudity but serve to show the bizarreness that was Captain Blood.  My memory is fuzzier than I would like with this game.  What I do remember is that it was very odd, brilliant and different from anything I have ever played in my life.  Details about the game can be found here.

A major character in the game was an alien that resembled a beautiful human nude female.  It was the first time I had seen nudity in a video game and it rattled me a bit.  Captain Blood is an interesting example because the nudity was used to prove a point instead of a cheap trick or played for laughs.  If you treated this character well “she” appeared to you as beautiful, if you treated her with disrespect she became a horrible tentacled thing.  This is the earliest example I can recall of this type of content presenting itself with an iota of maturity in a game.

Night Trap

Shooting forward a few years we have a game that seems to have shaken Joe Lieberman to the core.  Night Trap had a cover that folks cried sexism over and a theme song that you can’t unhear.

Night Trap was a repackaging of an unpublished VHS game on Sega CD.  By the time of publishing the footage was already five years old and it already had not aged well.  It stars an overacting Dana Plato.  It has nightgowns and women who take of their shirts to reveal their purple bras for no reason.  The game is somehow less than the sum of its parts.

Why talk about this?  The “sexuality” and violence in this game along with a few others helped create the ESRB.  In question was a scene where a woman was killed in a bathroom while wearing a nightgown by ninjas that were apparently were directed to walk like gorillas and assassinate her with one of those devices that senior citizens get cans off of high shelves with.  Link

Night Trap became one of the subjects of a congressional hearing on video game violence co-chaired by Joe Lieberman.  It was asserted that you were the one that was trapping and murdering women with the aforementioned gripping device.  In this particular case facts did not seem to get in the way of outrage and we end up with an interesting little milestone in video game history.

As an extra present for your eyes, here is the “party” scene from the game.

Duke Nukem 3D

I think he might be getting his money out to buy one of those pickled peppers stuffed with cheese.

Duke is a storied franchise with a tragic ending that we can discuss around a fire at a later time.  I am including Nukem as an example not because it is unusual in its portrayal of sexual themes but because it is honest.  The Duke is a lecherous cur.  A cigar chomping, exploitative macho parody and he never strays from his cliché.   The game may not have moved the subject forward any, but at the very least it knew who he was.

Grand Theft Auto IV: The Lost and the Damned

If you have gotten this far in the article I already assume you know that it is NSFW

Jumping ahead again we finally get to GTA.  GTA is no stranger to sexual controversy, but in L&D they pushed the boundaries rather hard.  GTA: L&D contains full frontal nudity.  Nudity of this type in a game is rare to begin with but they went ahead and included male full frontal nudity.

This is notable almost for the lack of controversy it created.  There were some spikes in media attention but they quickly died down.  Sexual themes in games are becoming part of the narrative and they are appropriately rated for 17+ year olds.

I would have loved to be a fly on the wall when an uninformed parent who purchased this for their child walks in on a screenful of middle-aged nude senator.

Mass Effect & Dragon Age: Origins

Mass Effect lit up Fox News with a fictional tale of how much graphic sex there was in this game.  People were outraged and game developers were burned in written effigies by the blogosphere.  This is the scene that people were so troubled about…

The sex scene is played out whether you are male or female.  A lot was said about this being a “lesbian” sex scene when you are a female character, but do human gender dynamics come in to play with fictional aliens?  Can they even be female?  The hubbub reminds me of a censored scene in Rocky and Bullwinkle where the main characters were about to be served for dinner and one of the executives demanded that they could not show cannibalism.  One of the creators replied with “Is it really cannibalism to eat a moose and a squirrel?”

In response Dragon Age added more and varied opportunities for romance this time with multiple options and partners.  It is not the focus of the game and does change the dynamic of your characters interactions.  This time the reaction from outside sources was substantially quieter.

With the exception of the Bioware titles and the GTA expansion we see some pretty ham handed insertions of sex into the stories of games.  I think the same can be said for any medium, books, television, movies etc.  Video games have gone from swinging in trees and walking on all fours to an intelligent thinking bipedal treatment of the subject in only three decades.  The other mediums took much longer to get to the same place.  I do not claim to know why this is, maybe it is because video games are more of an extension to the other mediums than something completely new.  There will always be locker room humor in games just like there is everywhere else, but thanks to good writing we are starting to respectful and even elegant treatments of the subject.  Sex is such a huge part of human nature and removing it wholesale from an entire medium without explanation would take the humanity out the story.

I have missed many examples here from early video game pornography and text adventures, the “hot coffee” scandal from Grand Theft Auto and others such as Phantasmagoria, Leather Goddesses of Phobos and the sex mini games from God of War and even the odd Cho Aniki.  Feel free to stir up some of your own controversies by talking about the above examples or things I have missed in the comments.

Filed under: culture, politics , , , , , ,

June 8, 2009 • 9:23 pm 0

Government support for games

If you live in the United States, gaming is probably the last thing that comes to mind when you think of government-supported industries. (Unless, of course, you count casinos.) I’m not talking about California or Washington (think EA and Microsoft) which combined make up more than 50% of the U.S. game industry, but rather states that you don’t normally associate with gaming– such as Georgia, Texas, or Massachusetts.

Texas recently passed a law (HB873) that further supports the entertainment industry. Going into effect on Sept.1, the bill increases existing incentives on film, television, and– yes– game production (Games fall under “digital interactive media production”). According to this bill, any game developer that takes on a project worth $100,000 or more will receive state support of 5% for their expenses. In order to receive this support, more than 60% of the game must be produced within Texas and more than 70% of the employees working on the game have to be Texas residents.

The Texan government is implementing this legislation, because, believe it or not, gaming is an important industry for the state, but growth has been slowing down lately. The Texas government’s game industry amounts to more than $1.49 million a year (according to a report by the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts). The state houses about 90 game companies.

It is also competing with other states such as Georgia, which started offering 20% tax credit for 20 percent of in-state spending for game developers working on projects worth $500,000 or more late last year.  What’s more, if the game developer is willing to put the state’s peach logo into its content, it gets another 10% tax discount. Georgia Trend–a local business magazine–says that  the Gwinnett County Chamber of Commerce is planning a digital entertainment incubator, and that the Savannah Economic Development Authority is offering one year of free rent for digital media companies. It’s no wonder that EA has been expanding its presence in Atlanta!

Massachusetts is also supporting game companies through its Create Boston program. With its proximity to many great educational institutes, it is perhaps natural that Boston be the nurturing ground for up and coming game companies. Harmonix, developer of Guitar Hero and Rock Band, is one of Boston’s recent success stories.

Although Boston accounts for less than 5% of the national game designer pool, government officials are hoping to expand the gaming industry and hopefully attract people from the west coast. The Create Boston program is targeting smaller firms, offering loans ranging from $15,000 to $150,000 for ambitious entrepreneurs seeking to establish a new business, or for businesses that are willing to relocate to Boston.

Filed under: politics

May 8, 2009 • 7:25 pm 1

Is Machinima Fair Use?

I attended a panel at Play Machinima Law, a Stanford conference on machinima law, where the main discussion was trying to figure out if machinima was fair use, and if it was, to what extent would be considered “fair.” A lot of the discussions focused on the end-user license agreements and how game producers could set boundaries on how game users utilize the content within the game.

In case you don’t know what machinima is, it is an animated film that uses 3D virtual worlds that already exist– such as games or Second Life. For instance, World of WarCraft, The Sims, Halo, CounterStrike, etc. have been used to create machinima. (Machinima.com is one of the best sites for compiled machinima.) These virtual worlds are used for not only their background/scenery but also the characters.

When game makers created games, they had no idea that their games would be used as an engines to create 3D animated movies. However, now that people are using games as filmmaking tools, they are beginning to think whether 1) that violates copyrights of the gamemaker and 2) if so, how they should create rules. Game makers have the advantage of controlling user activity because gamers have to agree to end-user license agreements (although how many people actually read them in detail is disputed).

Game companies aren’t opposed to machinima. To some extent, they are flattered and excited that their products are being used for creative productions. However, at the end of the day, although the end user license agreements are different depending on the platform, most games inevitably create boundaries. On most games, machinima makers are not allowed to create work for commercial purposes. Of course, at this point, lawyers are also arguing what exactly a “commercial purpose” is.

As pointed out by AJ of Kotaku, this is a problem for people who want to make money from their machinima. Also, although submission for film festivals is currently viewed as a noncommercial purpose falling under fair use, one could always argue that the use of the machinima by a director as a promotional tool for future filmmaking deals could be viewed as commercial.

Naturally, the problem becomes more complicated when the machinima maker uses copyrighted music. A lot of amateur machinima (stuff that teenagers post on Youtube) are like music videos with pop songs mashed with video footage from the game. Although music was viewed as a separate legal issue from the perspective of the lawyers (because the copyright holder would be the record industry instead of the game industry), it is still an important legal factor for the machinima makers.

Of all the game representatives that were present, The Sims seemed to be the most open to machinima—especially because it is including an easy-to-use video capturing tool in its upcoming Sims 3. But even in Sims, if there are product placements or other trademark items, machinima becomes a problem. For instance, if your character is wearing a T-shirt that was actually a product placement, would it be okay to portray that T-shirt in the machinima? Those are the types of questions game company lawyers are trying to answer.

Second Life, unfortunately, was not represented at the panel (perhaps because it is not considered a game) but lawyers seemed to be terrified about how copyright would work in Second Life. “Second Life Is worse than real life. You can film in New York without worrying that fashion of someone walking by or the texture of pavement is owned by someone, but not in Second Life, since Linden Lab doesn’t even have authority over the rights of the content that users create,” said Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

In the U.S., copyright was created to “promote the progress of science and useful arts.” If games had such strong copyright laws in the first place, would machinima ever have been developed at all? And how will companies control users’ behavior with games that are global? Perhaps the best thing is to think of games as the real world, and let people express their creativity without having Big Brother watching over their shoulder.

Filed under: politics , , , , , ,

December 25, 2008 • 9:12 pm 0

Trading cyber money offline is illegal?

Of all countries, it angers me that Korea thinks offline trading of cyber money is illegal. According to the wire service Yonhap,   a local court in Busan fined two 30-somethings for trading Lineage cyber money with real money, saying they violated gaming laws. Judge Lee noted that the law forbids offline trading of cyber money, and that that would apply to regular games, not just online gambling sites. It would not have been a problem, the judge said, if the exchanges were made on an individual basis, but these men were doing it for business purposes. This implies that only people who shed blood sweat and tears (and vast amounts of time) playing online games have the right to “fairly trade” their virtual goods offline.

The ruling was somewhat outrageous, because these two people had been using cyber item broker sites such as Item Bay or Item Mania to buy cyber items at a low price and resell them at a higher price. In doing so, they had made about $20,000 in about two months. It wasn’t like they are employing people to play games or running a program to generate for auto game-play (both of which have been done in the past). They did what was legal and typical of anyone who plays the market.  Smart guys.

The government tried to explain the rationale of the court, saying that the current game law only supports sales of cyber items that are acquired through “normal means.” Buying those items on an eBayisque site and reselling them is not “normal,” an unnamed  government official said in the Yonhap article.

Naturally, the broker sites are not happy about the verdict, because the court’s interpretation could very well make them illegal. Gamers are interested in seeing how things will develop, especially because this was the first time a court made a ruling on offline trading of game items. Being a country where online gaming is a quasi national pastime, there is naturally a huge market for cyber item sellers and brokers. According to the Korea Game Development Institute last year, the market for that kind of trade is estimated to be about $700 million in Korea, not including individual trading and the black market, because the figures are based on tax reports filed by the broker companies.

When they first developed Lineage in 1998, NCsoft had no idea cyber items would be traded for cash offline. They realized it was a huge market when people were not only trading hard-to-obtain “items” for hard cash, but also game characters– for people who wanted to play at high levels but did not want to spend hundreds of hours developing their character. A similar problem happened in World of Warcraft, released by Blizzard in 2001. Blizzard had less trouble with the offline sales of cyber items, by making rare items acquired through quests non-transferable. However, that did not solve the problem of offline sales of in-game gold; although it tried to address som companies in the U.S., it has little jurisdiction over numerous gold farms in China, where people are paid to sit at a computer and play games to obtain cyber cash.

Why can’t we leave everything to the market to decide? For Korea, there is also the more complicated issue of online gambling falling under the umbrella concept of trading cyber goods for real cash than playing a fair game. In Korea, gambling is only allowed to foreigners with the except of one casino (tucked away in a remote mountainous location). Gambling on the Internet is also illegal unless all of your cyber earnings remain in cyberland. In addition to local web sites, the government makes sure Internet service providers block addresses of foreign gambling sites.

Of course, the matter of offline trading of cyber items has many people worried– not just gamers, but also the government, which is in an uncomfortable position because it is trying to nurture the game industry as a major driving factor for the economy while trying to clamp down on gamblers. A year ago, it amended laws on “game industry promotion” in which it attempted to create a basic framework to block cash exchange for gambling purposes and “other new types of digital property.” (That is quite ironic, given the fact that digital property and copyright was almost rendered useless in Korea because of its 99% broadband penetration and average household Internet speeds at 100mbps.)

Do we have to exercise so much control over online games? Why should game makers have entire control over their games? Second Life gives the perfect example of how the seamless exchange of cyber money and real money can fuel a virtual economy. But I think that is exactly the point. When the government talks about trying to boost the local economy, they are thinking of how to make things better for gaming companies. So Linden Lab would be a great example that shows how a virtual economy could be actively linked with an offline one without the game company itself making much profits.

It’s great that the government is trying to help out the game industry, but it really shouldn’t be making laws to snub the free market. They made a mistake and made a law so general when they were only trying to stop people from online gambling so now that it can be applied to almost anything. It’s only slightly comforting that Korea’s law system, unlike Western systems, is not entirely based on precedents because this ruling was obviously a bad precedent.

Filed under: culture, politics

Flickr Photos

Steve Chiang of Zynga on social gaming

Steve Chiang of Zynga on social gaming

Steve Chiang of Zynga on social gaming

Steve Chiang of Zynga on social gaming

More Photos

Twitter Musings

  • Dear Metroid Other M, why can I not play you in 1080p on the console? I think Japan hates me. 1 week ago
  • Am I the only human on the planet who played and finished the Atari 2600 version of Megaforce (yes, a movie tie-in) when it was out? 2 weeks ago
  • DC Universe trailer is completely underwhelming. 3 weeks ago
  • 8 Year old impressions of Adventure for the 2600. http://bit.ly/bg6XgZ 3 weeks ago
  • Played around with League of Legends a bit last night. Pretty solid. DotA for the RTS Win. 3 weeks ago
  • Guild Wars 2 has some steampunky elements so maybe that will satisfy me. 3 weeks ago
  • Anyone have any feelings on the Bioshock Infinite CG trailer from yesterday? Made me feel like we need a steampunk MMO pretty badly. 3 weeks ago

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives

RSS Game News